[Analysis plan]: SBP Site

Open
#158 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Newbie friendliness
25/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
python, r
Domain
data

Research direction

The issue identifies a new SBP Site indicator owned by APP-MF and lists R, SPSS, Stata, and Python as relevant software, but names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by reviewing existing indicator scripts in the repository and determine the required inputs, outputs, and implementation scope for the three unchecked script tasks. Done should be defined for each requested script before work begins.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Indicator name

SBP Site

Create or modify indicator?

Create

Contact Details

No response

Corporate Result Framework

Not included nor piloted

Unit owning the indicator

APP-MF

Batch of tasks created - DO NOT MODIFY
  • [Task]: R script - {{ data.indicator-name }}
  • [Task]: SPSS script - {{ data.indicator-name }}
  • [Task]: Stata script - {{ data.indicator-name }}
Software version

R, SPSS, Stata, Python

Relevant log output

No response

Code of Conduct
  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
Dominant language
Scheme
Stars
35
Forks
31
Avg merge
1d 1h
Merged PRs (30d)
4

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from WFP-VAM/RAMResourcesScripts

All issues in WFP-VAM/RAMResourcesScripts

Similar issues

More Data Engineering issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.