chore: add labels for a clear reproductive steps flow
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Domain
- tooling
Research direction
Start with the issue's three requirements: define the reproductive-steps flow chart, identify the labels needed to support it, and determine the scope of the waiting-for-response bot. Done means the flow is documented, the supporting labels are specified, and the bot behavior or a separate task for it is clearly defined.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Description
Cross posting from internal conversations:
As a side note, it would be ideal if we add a tag named something like needs reproductive confirmation or similar where the description is: The issue needs confirmation from developers that it has been reproduced .
Looking into the future we should do something like:
- Check if the issue has reproductive and clear reproductive steps:
- Add the "has reproductive steps" label if it has together with "needs reproductive confirmation"
- Add the "needs reproductive steps" label if it has not
- Check those "has reproductive steps" issues can be reproduced
- Add the "has been reproduced" if it was reproduced with a comment that details the steps and any additional context to reproduce
- Add the "could not be reproduced" if it was not reproduced with a comment that details at what step the reproductive steps could not be followed together with the "waiting for response" label
- If the "waiting for response" label persists for 2 weeks without any updated to comments we would have the BOT close the issue with a message along the lines of: ""Hey since this seems to be silent for a while, I am closing this for now. If anything comes up, don't hesitate on telling." (Credits to Renan, he usually used this as a template for his replies and I liked it and started using it).
Requirements
- There is a defined flow chart explaining this flow
- There are labels to support the flow outlined in the flow chart
- There is a BOT that closes waiting for response issues (we could have a separate task for this effort if preferred)
Additional Context
No response
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 6
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
nightscout/nocturne#1424 ·
-
A claim comment carrying the issue number is silently declined while the workflow reports success Openarea: repo bug perceived difficulty: 2
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
paritytech/zombienet-sdk#591 ·
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
mruangutai/harness#1897 ·