(lifting) SCF opcode not implemented
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- reverse-engineering
Research direction
The issue identifies an unimplemented SCF opcode in the Z80 lifting work but names no file, entry point, or test. Start by locating the Python Z80 architecture and BinaryView lifting implementation, then compare the surrounding opcode handling. Done means SCF is implemented and its behavior is covered by the project's existing validation or tests.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 12
- Forks
- 5
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from Vector35/Z80
-
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
INC writes no flags Open
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 86/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
Similar issues
-
documentation help wanted
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
simonw/sqlite-utils#872 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100