Please error, or at least warn, when a managed type is included in INetworkSerializeByMemcpy
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Tech stack
- csharp
- Domain
- networking
Research direction
Start by locating the INetworkSerializeByMemcpy definition and its validation or serialization tests. Trace how implementing types are checked during compilation or runtime, then add coverage for string and other managed fields; done means such types produce a build error or warning instead of unsafe memcpy serialization.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
My coworker was unfamiliar with INetworkSerializeByMemcpy and the FixedStringNNNBytes types, and added a string field to an existing INetworkSerializeByMemcpy struct. This caused me great headaches (it made it into a publicly released patch), trying to track down segfault heap corruption that only showed up in very specific multiplayer circumstances (the string was normally null, which probably masked the issue).
Describe the solution you'd like
Please cause a build error when a managed type (a class, a string, or the like) is included in an INetworkSerializeByMemcpy type. I cannot think of any use case where it would be valid or intended to serialize a managed GC pointer by memcpy. At least a warning if nothing else.
It doesn't have to be perfect, even just checking for string would be lovely - string specifically is such a massive footgun, it's so easy to accidentally include and think it'll work fine. The fact it crashes later on via unrelated segfault heap corruption bringing down the editor, instead of a C# Exception, is especially rough.
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 2.3k
- Forks
- 461
- Avg merge
- 3d 16h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 20
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from Unity-Technologies/com.unity.netcode.gameobjects
-
stat:import type:bug
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
stat:reply-needed type:support
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
Unity-Technologies/com.unity.netcode.gameobjects#4095 · 10 comments ·
-
stat:awaiting-triage stat:Investigating type:bug
Unity-Technologies/com.unity.netcode.gameobjects#3912 · 5 comments · 1 assignee ·
-
Tracking type:feature-2.x
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
Unity-Technologies/com.unity.netcode.gameobjects#3870 · 5 comments ·
-
stat:awaiting-response stat:imported type:bug
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 38/100
Unity-Technologies/com.unity.netcode.gameobjects#3802 · 2 comments ·
All issues in Unity-Technologies/com.unity.netcode.gameobjects
Similar issues
-
type/automation type/tech-debt
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
t/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
ci-failure-cause test-failure
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
area:auth FE mvp P3
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
klasolsson81/jobbliggaren#1788 ·