Verify evals on Papers with Code

Open Beginner friendly
#1 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
2/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Newbie friendliness
68/100
Issue type
Documentation
Clarity
Clearly specified
Activity status
Active
Domain
documentation

Research direction

Review the linked Papers with Code paper page and its BrowseComp-Plus result, then compare the imported scores, model names, benchmark protocol, and openness metadata with the paper and official release artifacts. Confirm the entries or report any corrections needed in the issue; completion is a clear verification or a documented list of discrepancies.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Hi,

Niels here from the open-source team at Hugging Face. Congratulations on your work!

I've made the paper and 1 paper-native evaluation available on Papers with Code.

The paper is part of the Agents task page.

You can review, for example, the BrowseComp-Plus result.

Would it be possible to verify these results and let me know if any score, model name, benchmark protocol, or openness metadata should be corrected? The imported rows are tied to the paper or its official release artifacts; comparison-table baselines were not added.

You can also edit the task, methods, project page, and GitHub URL directly from the paper page using your Hugging Face account.

Kind regards,

Niels

Dominant language
Python
Stars
128
Forks
13
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.