Verify evals on Papers with Code

Open Beginner friendly
#9 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
1/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Newbie friendliness
72/100
Issue type
Documentation
Clarity
Clearly specified
Activity status
Active
Domain
documentation

Research direction

Open the linked Papers with Code paper and its three paper-native evaluations; compare each imported score, model name, benchmark protocol, and openness metadata with the paper and official release artifacts. Done means reporting that the rows are correct or identifying precise corrections, without adding comparison-table baselines.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Hi,

Niels here from the open-source team at Hugging Face. Congratulations on your work!

I've made the paper and 3 paper-native evaluations available on Papers with Code.

The paper is part of the Agents task page.

Would it be possible to verify these results and let me know if any score, model name, benchmark protocol, or openness metadata should be corrected? The imported rows are tied to the paper or its official release artifacts; comparison-table baselines were not added.

You can also edit the task, methods, project page, and GitHub URL directly from the paper page using your Hugging Face account.

Kind regards,

Niels

Dominant language
Python
Stars
1.2k
Forks
123
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from TIGER-AI-Lab/OpenResearcher

All issues in TIGER-AI-Lab/OpenResearcher

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.