Enforce that `abstract` methods aren't defined on an interface's singleton class
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100
Research direction
The entry points named are interface! and abstract; begin by reading the linked Sorbet documentation and tracing where those declarations are handled. Done means the shown singleton-class declaration raises; no repository file or test is named in the issue.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
This should raise:
module MyInterface
interface!
class << self
abstract def foo; end # ❌
end
end
See:
- Dominant language
- Ruby
- Stars
- 3
- Forks
- 5
- Avg merge
- 8d 23h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 8
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from Shopify/type_toolkit
-
good first issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
Shopify/type_toolkit#4 ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
Shopify/type_toolkit#45 ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
Shopify/type_toolkit#20 ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
Shopify/type_toolkit#14 ·
-
good first issue
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
Shopify/type_toolkit#11 · 3 comments ·
All issues in Shopify/type_toolkit
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
palladius/rails8-app-on-gcp#145 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
rubocop/rubocop-rspec#2236 ·
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
riscv/riscv-unified-db#2624 · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100