why model output is too much slow?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- machine-learning
Research direction
The issue does not identify a file, model, command, or reproducible case. Start by reproducing the reported slow model output in the repository, then trace the relevant execution path and define the expected runtime before deciding what evidence or change is needed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
This issue has no description.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 351
- Forks
- 38
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from OpenGVLab/EfficientQAT
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 78/100
OpenGVLab/EfficientQAT#31 ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 28/100
OpenGVLab/EfficientQAT#34 ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
OpenGVLab/EfficientQAT#33 ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
OpenGVLab/EfficientQAT#32 ·
-
About Dataset Open
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 20/100
OpenGVLab/EfficientQAT#30 ·
All issues in OpenGVLab/EfficientQAT
Similar issues
-
area: harness bug status: needs-triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
Human-Agent-Society/reef#625 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 80/100
learningequality/kolibri#15351 · 2 comments ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
Name consistency Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
eellak/triplestore#65 · 1 comment ·