Access base class protected methods in static block

🔍 Search Terms

• Dynamic method override
• Static block super
• Static block prototype

✅ Viability Checklist

• This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
• This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
• This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
• This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
• This isn't a request to add a new utility type: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/No-New-Utility-Types
• This feature would agree with the rest of our Design Goals: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/TypeScript-Design-Goals

⭐ Suggestion

Hey there, I have a use case where I want to declare/override a protected method using it's prototype.

With the addition of static blocks I can now override the method itself, however I can't call the same method of the base class using super. This makes it impossible to create dynamic overrides of a prototype method atm.

My suggestion would be to allow the usage of the base type prototypes in a static block of the class as well. This would make it a lot easier to dynamically override/declare a method without using instance fields.

📃 Motivating Example

TypeScript now supports dynamic method overrides using static initialization blocks instead of runtime checks.

💻 Use Cases

1. What do you want to use this for? Dynamic method declarations / overrides Dynamic class creation using an options object.

2. What shortcomings exist with current approaches? Currently the only way I see to do this is either:

• Use as any/ which destroys type information
• Use as DerivedType which allows the call with type information
• Always override the method and call the additional method in an if branch which usually requires an instance field
• Declare the method on an instance field instead of the prototype which uses more memory
• Use @ts-ignore because you know what you are doing

3. What workarounds are you using in the meantime?

• I use (Base.prototype as DerivedType).myMethod which imho is the best solution atm

Example: https://www.typescriptlang.org/play/?ssl=25&ssc=2&pln=1&pc=1#code/MYGwhgzhAECyCeBhcVoG8BQ1oAcBOA9gC4CmwpAJtALbywlEAWBFAFAJTpbbQD0v0AHTCIBaiWggCAcwCWwbgF8MyjKEgwEAERJ5ZANxIVkG6CQAepAHYVNSFBEzZ8xMpWgFDePRQm16TCwcXDx8AsKC0KLi0GAUFLJEsgRWYCCSMvLc2BAArji6gv4MzGzsShjcEERgScAhPEyyEIIuRMTwBUV0JSzQALzQAGa5VuTJVqxNEABccPA6eobGDpxOoWFCwlFiEnEJSSlpGXIK2Tx5BXjdAaXB-FH5utCjvup4RtBEEABMAGx-AAMlQ28xMUFahHaRE6JBuvQogmAaRAU0YzXYAG5NlZiLEQFIAO6fb4-AAsZL+II2rAQ4JabQ6BViMDAVng7HhgURyIJaIxmwAKuiYISCHgANYwABGuSI0GaLysEDAQxI52wtPsGkhxCZezsiwMRnpnOK3KRKP5EE4D2FirFkplcoVMFGKrV52U2GUiiAA