Microsoft/TypeScript

switch (typeof something) isn't seen as exhaustive

Open

#56,786 opened on Dec 14, 2023

View on GitHub
 (5 comments) (0 reactions) (0 assignees)TypeScript (6,726 forks)batch import
Domain: check: Control FlowHelp WantedPossible Improvement

Repository metrics

Stars
 (48,455 stars)
PR merge metrics
 (Avg merge 6d 17h) (9 merged PRs in 30d)

Description

🔎 Search Terms

  • typeof
  • switch
  • narrow
  • type guard

🕗 Version & Regression Information

  • This is the behavior in every version I tried, and I reviewed the FAQ for entries about Type Guards

⏯ Playground Link

https://www.typescriptlang.org/play?ts=5.3.2#code/GYVwdgxgLglg9mABBAFgUwgawIIBtcA8AKgHwAUAznALZpQoxgDmAXIkQJRtGIDeAUIkQUA7jCipEZKAE8ADmjjBhNOg2Yc+gocgCGFNIgBEYENQBGaAE5GW2oRH2Gj5mE0ZRb9vQePm4cLhoumBeOj7OFDIWgWE6jr5G4AAmaMCMaMlxDk7GoJCwCNkRxnDmAFYYnnbhCZFQVoxMxUJWdCBWSFS09E0A3NoAvvyDQA

💻 Code

function checkAll<T>(something: T): T {
  switch (typeof something) {
    case "number":
    case "bigint":
    case "boolean":
    case "symbol":
    case "undefined":
    case "function":
    case "object":
    case "string":
      return something;
  }
}

🙁 Actual behavior

This emits the TS error: "Function lacks ending return statement and return type does not include 'undefined'.(2366)"

🙂 Expected behavior

No error, since all possible results of typeof are handled.

Additional information about the issue

It seems to only be an issue when the function argument is generic. It works if I switch the return type and parameter types to any, but I'm not sure that's a fair comparison.

Contributor guide