Microsoft/TypeScript

Adding an overload to .filter breaks specific inference with nested functions

Open

#56,013 opened on Oct 6, 2023

View on GitHub
 (0 comments) (2 reactions) (0 assignees)TypeScript (6,726 forks)batch import
BugDomain: check: Type InferenceHelp Wanted

Repository metrics

Stars
 (48,455 stars)
PR merge metrics
 (Avg merge 6d 17h) (9 merged PRs in 30d)

Description

🔎 Search Terms

"filter inference overload", "filter boolean"

🕗 Version & Regression Information

  • This is the behavior in every version I tried, and I reviewed the FAQ for entries about inferred types

⏯ Playground Link

https://tsplay.dev/wQbrvN

💻 Code

type NonFalsy<T> = T extends false | 0 | "" | null | undefined | 0n
    ? never
    : T;

// Comment this out
interface Array<T> { filter(predicate: BooleanConstructor, thisArg?: any): NonFalsy<T>[]; }

const id = <T,>() => (t: T) => !!t;

['foo', 'bar'].filter(id())
//                    ^?

🙁 Actual behavior

Nested function inference works (type parameter is string) without the additional overload, and fails (type parameter is unknown) with the overload (even though the added overload isn't the one in use).

🙂 Expected behavior

Nested function inference should work regardless of whether an overload is added to .filter or not.

Additional information about the issue

Adding the overload is described in https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/50387 and made popular by ts-reset. It's possible the overload order may matter in this instance, but difficult to test when the main overloads are coming from lib definitions.

Contributor guide