性能数据中如果Bad_Speculation占比超过20%，超过TMA 1%-5%较多，是否定义为性能瓶颈？Bad_Speculation占比较高一般是什么导致的呢，求解答
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Domain
- performance
Research direction
The issue body is empty and names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by locating the project context for the Bad_Speculation and TMA metrics, then determine whether the stated thresholds define a bottleneck and document the supported causes of a high Bad_Speculation ratio.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
This issue has no description.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 197
- Forks
- 32
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from MegEngine/mperf
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 30/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
在树莓派上进行测试 Open
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 15/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
cntfrq_el0精度问题 Open
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 20/100
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
AXERA-TECH/ax-llm#77 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
games-on-whales/wolf#509 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
-
bug-unconfirmed
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
NVIDIA/cuda-samples#453 ·