asyncio support
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
Research direction
Start with the README's description of missing asyncio support, then investigate the referenced asyncio.Task.current_task and loop.set_task_factory APIs. Determine whether the proposed contextvars task factory approach fits the project; done should mean asyncio support is implemented and its behavior is covered by appropriate tests.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Hi! I know that asyncio support is not yet implemented (as described on README), but to "get there" wouldn't be like adding some kind of contextvars task factory into the asyncio.Task.current_task using loop.set_task_factory? Thanks! 😃
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 90
- Forks
- 9
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from MagicStack/contextvars
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 20/100
MagicStack/contextvars#18 · 1 comment · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 45/100
MagicStack/contextvars#17 · 1 reaction ·
-
2.4: pytest warning Open
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 35/100
MagicStack/contextvars#16 ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
MagicStack/contextvars#15 · 2 reactions ·
All issues in MagicStack/contextvars
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100