Missing LICENSE file in the repo of ver 0.1.1
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Start by checking the repository contents for the LICENSE file in the latest version and compare that license with the 0.1.1 release. Confirm which license applies to version 0.1.1; done means the appropriate LICENSE file is present for that version or the relationship to the latest license is clearly documented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Currently I'm using base32-encode version 0.1.1, but can't find a LICENSE file in the repo of ver 0.1.1.
Could you add the LICENSE file in the repo of ver 0.1.1?
Or is it possible to use the LICENSE file of the latest version as the license for ver 0.1.1?
Thanks in advance.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 24
- Forks
- 11
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from LinusU/base32-encode
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 20/100
LinusU/base32-encode#10 · 1 comment ·
All issues in LinusU/base32-encode
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
HarperFast/skills#96 ·
-
[Block] Latest Posts [Type] Bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Automattic/studio#4908 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
sugarlabs/musicblocks#8847 ·