Packaging section could use a little more discussion
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Start with the courseware page linked in the issue, especially the “Creating a Package and Classes” exercise, and review the referenced GeeksforGeeks discussion for useful coverage. Expand the packaging discussion so the relationship between folder structure and the package declaration is clear, including the reported mismatch; done means the exercise addresses this confusion.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
A couple of students in the 2020 Java Launchcode session had issues with packages while doing the exercises and studios (e.g. they will put their code in package A.B.C.myCode in the folder structure, but their package line in their code says "package myCode;") I see very little of it mentioned in the courseware (right here: https://education.launchcode.org/java-web-development/chapters/data-types/exercises.html#creating-a-package-and-classes) - shouldn't there be a little bigger discussion on it?
Here is a discussion that is pretty good:
- Dominant language
- CSS
- Stars
- 13
- Forks
- 59
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from LaunchCodeEducation/java-web-development
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 45/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 45/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 45/100
All issues in LaunchCodeEducation/java-web-development
Similar issues
-
triage
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
feature pydanty:is-working
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
pydantic/pydantic-ai#8647 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
:watch: Not Triaged dotnet-fsharp/svc
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100