Discussion: Openness to significant changes to the project?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 22/100
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- github-actions, java
- Domain
- backend, build-system, ci-cd, networking
Research direction
Read the issue's proposals covering logging dependencies, SSH library support, optional JSON structure, Gradle, and GitHub Actions. There are no files or tests named, so first establish maintainer agreement and a concrete scope; done would require an agreed plan rather than the broad set of changes currently listed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
And by that I mean significant refactoring changes, not really changing functionality.
I'm using this library at work, and it suffers from a few problems:
- including a java logging library instead of only using
slf4j-api- This is honestly a trivial fix. The slf4j-log4j library should be runtime scoped
- Uses an out of maintenance SSH library
- I'd switch to sshj which is still receiving activity
- Or instead, make it SSH library agnostic
- I also want SSH-agent support, so that I don't have to do weird SSH RSA-only PEM format key things.
- sshj supports modern algorithms and ssh key types
- doesn't support the optional JSON structure that the pyEZ library does
- I'm not yet sure how to make this work, but I'd like to try :)
Not a problem, but a personal preference:
- I'd love to see it use gradle for the build system
- I'm just a fan of gradle, as it gives us everything maven does, but also flexibility if we need it.
- github actions to do java matrix builds against 8, 11, and now 17
- Would love to have some CI for all the java versions, to make sure it stays alive with modern JDKs
- This is pretty trivial
How open is the project to some significant pull requests that change big things in the application?
What do folks think about the ideas I've listed here?
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 90
- Forks
- 64
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from Juniper/netconf-java
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
Juniper/netconf-java#85 ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
Juniper/netconf-java#81 · 2 comments ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
Juniper/netconf-java#75 · 5 comments ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
Juniper/netconf-java#69 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 38/100
Juniper/netconf-java#68 · 2 comments ·
All issues in Juniper/netconf-java
Similar issues
-
awaiting triage bug Causes friction Hop Gui P1 P2 Transforms
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
apache/flink-agents#1152 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
jenkinsci/blueocean-plugin#5417 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
objectionary/eo-graphs#75 ·