cos2cos missing
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- shell
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Start by checking the README for the remaining reference to the removed cos2cos example and review the repository history for its prior content. Done means the cos2cos example is restored in the README and the documentation no longer refers to a missing example.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Cos2cos example has been removed but still in readme.
Can I have this example back in the latest.
- Dominant language
- Shell
- Stars
- 117
- Forks
- 153
- Avg merge
- 2d 20h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 17
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from IBM/CodeEngine
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
IBM/CodeEngine#494 · 1 comment ·
-
security
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 30/100
IBM/CodeEngine#493 · 1 comment ·
-
IBM/CodeEngine#321 · 2 comments · 1 assignee ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
IBM/CodeEngine#115 · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
IBM/CodeEngine#114 ·
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
uttrflow/uttrflow-swift#1439 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
msys2/MINGW-packages#31930 ·
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100