Cryptic error for infeasible investment options
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100
Research direction
Start by reproducing the failure with the attached simple_modified 2.zip model and trace the investment appraisal path that reports “Could not find optimal result: Infeasible.” Compare the lower availability and supply constraints, then establish which of the three proposed behaviors is accepted as done: exclude the option, relax supply, or cap capacity to avoid oversupply.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
The attached model fails with Could not find optimal result: Infeasible during investment appraisal.
I believe this is due to the presence of lower availability constraints, meaning that the asset cannot supply the remaining demands without exceeding them. The capacity constraint is set up to bound supply to less than or equal to demand (the idea being that it should max out demand as much as it can, so long as it has positive activity coefficients), but with lower availability constraints it's possible that this constraint cannot be met, making the problem infeasible. Three possible solutions:
- we exclude this investment option and allow the simulation to continue (possibly raising a warning)
- we relax (possibly remove entirely) the supply constraint, allowing this asset to be appraised. The appraisal metric would then have to take into account how much of the supplied commodity is actually demanded, which would penalise any wasteful assets
- find a way to calculate the max capacity that avoids having to oversupply, and cap capacities based on this. We already cap capacities based on current DLC and investment limits, so it would just be an additional cap, or a modification to the DLC calculation
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 8
- Forks
- 5
- Avg merge
- 11h 31m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 33
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from EnergySystemsModellingLab/MUSE2
-
bug documentation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
EnergySystemsModellingLab/MUSE2#1367 · 1 comment ·
-
Remove the `ironing out iteration 0` prefix from debug files when the ironing out loop is turned off Openmuse xiii question
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
EnergySystemsModellingLab/MUSE2#1221 ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
EnergySystemsModellingLab/MUSE2#1554 ·
-
bug
EnergySystemsModellingLab/MUSE2#1541 · 2 comments · 1 assignee ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
EnergySystemsModellingLab/MUSE2#1526 ·
All issues in EnergySystemsModellingLab/MUSE2
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
TheLarkInn/aipm#2413 ·
-
documentation
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
alexgorbatchev/simple-ptt#15 ·
-
tooling
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
todo:ticket
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
taikoxyz/taiko-mono#22168 · 1 comment ·