Add tests for appraisal optimisation
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 38/100
Research direction
Start by reviewing issue #448 to understand the similar approach, then locate the appraisal optimisation implementation and its existing tests. Add tests covering the optimisation behaviour described by that precedent and run the relevant Rust test suite to confirm they pass.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
This is similar to #448 and will require a similar approach.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 8
- Forks
- 5
- Avg merge
- 11h 31m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 33
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from EnergySystemsModellingLab/MUSE2
-
bug documentation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
EnergySystemsModellingLab/MUSE2#1367 · 1 comment ·
-
Remove the `ironing out iteration 0` prefix from debug files when the ironing out loop is turned off Openmuse xiii question
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
EnergySystemsModellingLab/MUSE2#1221 ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
EnergySystemsModellingLab/MUSE2#1554 ·
-
bug
EnergySystemsModellingLab/MUSE2#1541 · 2 comments · 1 assignee ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
EnergySystemsModellingLab/MUSE2#1526 ·
All issues in EnergySystemsModellingLab/MUSE2
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
TheLarkInn/aipm#2413 ·
-
documentation
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
alexgorbatchev/simple-ptt#15 ·
-
tooling
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
todo:ticket
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
taikoxyz/taiko-mono#22168 · 1 comment ·