Resolve Planning Docs validation failure for structured SOP sections
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- node.js, typescript
- Domain
- documentation, testing-qa
Research direction
Start with the linked Actions run and inspect the Node SOP lint step, then compare how the validator reads canonical structured documents with the required sections reported from the private knowledge checkout. Done means identifying whether the failure is in validation or missing private material and preserving the existing checks without exposing or inventing operational content.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
During authorized publication of all pending main commits, Planning Docs validation failed on pushed commit 975b7c6c514fe036c5796071d35669e64f68d6ea.
Run: https://github.com/DataTalksClub/dataops/actions/runs/34060237649
On-Call findings: the Node SOP lint step exits 2 with 90 violations across 15 SOPs. Each reports six missing required sections: summary, prerequisites, procedure, validation, troubleshooting, references. The private knowledge checkout and content-validation workflow itself succeeded; this is a document/schema validation failure, not an established credential problem. Similar failure existed on earlier main.
Diagnose whether the validator misreads canonical structured documents or the private knowledge lacks required material. Preserve actual checks; do not suppress errors or invent operational content. Keep operational document names, contents, links, and artifacts out of the public issue. Application/runtime fixes belong here; any private knowledge change requires an explicit, separately scoped authorization decision if not already covered.
The current app deployment and full browser CI are monitored separately. This issue does not claim those jobs failed or completed.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from DataTalksClub/dataops
-
backend bug needs grooming
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 75/100
DataTalksClub/dataops#227 · 1 comment ·
-
design enhancement frontend P1 portal testing
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
DataTalksClub/dataops#219 · 13 comments ·
-
design enhancement frontend P1 portal testing
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 15/100
DataTalksClub/dataops#221 · 17 comments ·
-
design docs enhancement frontend P1 portal testing
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 18/100
DataTalksClub/dataops#220 · 25 comments ·
-
design enhancement frontend P1 portal testing
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
DataTalksClub/dataops#222 · 31 comments ·
All issues in DataTalksClub/dataops
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
copse-dev/agent-pane#2953 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
Eynzof/Hermes-CN-Desktop#610 ·
-
bug clawsweeper:linked-pr-open clawsweeper:needs-live-repro clawsweeper:no-new-fix-pr impact:message-loss issue-rating: 🐚 platinum hermit P2 regression
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
calcite-components needs triage refactor
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
Esri/calcite-design-system#15203 ·