Proposal: Extend CycloneDX model to support hardware-software interface semantics
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Domain
- embedded-iot
Research direction
Start by reviewing CycloneDX's component properties, externalReferences, relationship metadata, and graph-like dependency extensions against the proposed MMIO, register, interrupt, DMA, and firmware-to-RTL examples. Done would require an agreed, implementable extension design for representing hardware-software interface semantics, but this issue does not define a specific file, test, or acceptance criteria.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Summary
Current CycloneDX specifications provide strong support for representing software components, dependencies, and vulnerability metadata. However, for cyber-physical systems (embedded, automotive, aerospace, industrial IoT), there is a missing semantic layer: explicit representation of hardware-software interface contracts.
This includes interactions such as:
- Memory-Mapped I/O (MMIO)
- Hardware register mappings
- Interrupt interfaces
- DMA channels
- Firmware-to-RTL lineage (e.g., High-Level Synthesis flows)
We refer to this missing abstraction as an Interface Bill of Materials (IBOM) concept.
##Problem Statement
SBOM and HBOM artifacts exist independently, but CycloneDX currently lacks a structured way to represent:
- relationships between firmware binaries and hardware registers
- interface-level dependencies between software drivers and RTL modules
- lifecycle changes in hardware-software contracts across updates
- temporal validity of hardware-software interfaces (e.g., FPGA reconfiguration)
As a result, interface-level risks such as firmware-to-gate contract drift cannot be represented or analyzed using existing BOM structures.
Proposed Direction (Non-normative)
Rather than introducing a new BOM type, this proposal suggests exploring whether CycloneDX extension mechanisms can represent interface semantics using:
- component
properties externalReferences- relationship metadata
- graph-like dependency extensions
Example (Illustrative Only)
{
"type": "firmware-interface",
"name": "UART_MMIO_Interface",
"properties": [
{
"name": "mmio.baseAddress",
"value": "0x40001000"
},
{
"name": "register",
"value": "UART_STATUS:0x04:read-only"
}
],
"relatedComponents": [
"uart_driver.c",
"uart_controller.v"
]
}
- Dominant language
- XSLT
- Stars
- 551
- Forks
- 93
- Avg merge
- 4h 51m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 42
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from CycloneDX/specification
-
Response vs Responce Open
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 68/100
CycloneDX/specification#1121 ·
-
defect documentation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
CycloneDX/specification#1115 ·
-
cap: cryptography-registry
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
CycloneDX/specification#1098 ·
-
defect
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 91/100
CycloneDX/specification#1045 · 2 comments ·
-
CDX 2.0 documentation ready for review
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
CycloneDX/specification#1035 ·
All issues in CycloneDX/specification
Similar issues
-
Status: Opened
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#120157 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
approved checks-failed
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
zwave-js/firmware-updates#390 · 1 comment ·