Star-catalogue depth (r<22→r<23) and PSF-selection bias from flux-radius cut
@calumhrmurray is already working on this.
Since Jul 15, 2026.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.
Description
From the Paris meeting (Fri 2pm): the flux-radius star selection shows a PSF-size residual bias centred ~−0.15 — investigate, with a Gaia cross-check as the obvious control. Related question: is extending the star catalogue r<22→r<23 useful (SPHEREx star flags vs stellar locus)?
Context: Paris meeting notes
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 18
- Forks
- 14
- Avg merge
- 8h 40m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from CosmoStat/shapepipe
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 78/100
All issues in CosmoStat/shapepipe
Similar issues
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
stephrobert/dsoxlab#238 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
sublimehq/package_control#1780 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
nwg-piotr/nwg-displays#145 ·