Allow evals to remove upperclasspeople from required signatures on request
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- tex
- Domain
- content, documentation
Research direction
Start by reading the constitution's existing provisions for evals, packets, and required signatures; the issue does not name a file or test. Clarify the circumstances for removing upperclasspeople and whether their signatures should count as alumni signatures or be excluded, then codify the agreed rule in the relevant TeX text.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Check one:
- Semantic Issue: something about the meaning of the text is different
- Non-semantic Issue: Spelling, grammar, or formatting changes.
Summary of issue:
Evals should have the ability to remove upperclasspeople from packet under certain circumstances such that their signatures will count the same as alumni signatures or are not counted towards required signatures on packet.
This has been accepted practice for several years dating back to my frosh year 4 years ago (most commonly members asking to be taken off). Probably a good thing to codify.
PS no flame pls. Not inspired by recent events or anything (??), we just forgot to do it in the original rewrite project.
- Dominant language
- TeX
- Stars
- 51
- Forks
- 80
- Avg merge
- 1d 22h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from ComputerScienceHouse/constitution
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
ComputerScienceHouse/constitution#306 · 2 comments ·
All issues in ComputerScienceHouse/constitution
Similar issues
-
Add: hunch Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
AbdelStark/awesome-typesafe#104 ·
-
a11y admissions.uiowa.edu needs grooming SiteImprove best practice
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
AllTheMods/ATM-10-L#19 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 74/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100