docs: establish project documentation and AI context
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Start with the requested docs/ directory structure and root AGENTS.md deliverables. Use the acceptance criteria to check that each architectural decision has a documented home, current and planned behavior are distinguished, and no document promises unimplemented functionality.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Objective
Create the initial docs/ system for QueueIt so both humans and coding agents have a single source of truth before feature work grows.
Problem
The project should not repeat the documentation and architecture drift that caused problems in previous projects. AI agents must be able to understand the product, constraints, architecture, and current decisions without guessing.
Deliverables
Create:
docs/
├── README.md
├── 00-product/
│ ├── vision.md
│ ├── scope.md
│ └── glossary.md
├── 01-architecture/
│ ├── overview.md
│ ├── extension-runtime.md
│ ├── queue-engine.md
│ └── adapter-system.md
├── 02-chatgpt/
│ ├── integration.md
│ ├── message-lifecycle.md
│ └── completion-detection.md
├── 03-ui/
│ ├── principles.md
│ └── screens.md
├── 04-data/
│ ├── state-model.md
│ └── persistence.md
├── 05-security/
│ └── threat-model.md
├── 06-monetization/
│ ├── free-paid.md
│ └── entitlement-model.md
├── 07-testing/
│ ├── strategy.md
│ └── e2e.md
└── 08-roadmap/
└── milestones.md
Also add a root-level AGENTS.md describing how AI agents must work on QueueIt, including reading the docs first, preserving architectural boundaries, avoiding speculative dependencies, updating docs when decisions change, and running validation before claiming completion.
Planned work
- #2 Product requirements and scope
- #3 Extension architecture
- #4 Queue state machine and persistence
- #5 ChatGPT lifecycle and completion detection
- #6 UI/UX system
- #7 Free/paid product model
- #8 Security, privacy, and permissions
- #9 Testing and reliability
- #10 Development workflow and AI-agent rules
Acceptance criteria
- Every architectural decision has a documented home.
- A new AI coding agent can read the docs and understand how QueueIt works.
- Docs distinguish current implementation from planned behavior.
- No document promises functionality that has not been implemented.
- The documentation structure remains small and navigable.
- Dominant language
- CSS
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from ChinmayOnGithub/queueit
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
ChinmayOnGithub/queueit#10 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
All issues in ChinmayOnGithub/queueit
Similar issues
-
documentation help wanted
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
-
user-reported
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
Kong/developer.konghq.com#7316 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
HarperFast/skills#96 ·
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
infinispan/infinispan#18150 ·