24.0.1 Needs Better Testing

Open
#43 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Newbie friendliness
30/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
shell
Domain
testing

Research direction

Review issue #42 and start with the StandupScript, using getblockcount as the existing baseline. Run several major commands and verify that blocks download without errors; testing the Linode is optional if you have access.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

We need better testing of #42. I ran each script and did test that the blocks were downloading with getblockcount, but it'd be good to just go a bit further, running through several major commands, seeing that everything indeed downloads without errors, etc.

@histamineblkr, would love it if you could test this for the StandupScript at the least. The Linode if you have the capability.

Dominant language
Shell
Stars
57
Forks
36
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from BlockchainCommons/Bitcoin-Standup-Scripts

All issues in BlockchainCommons/Bitcoin-Standup-Scripts

Similar issues

More Shell/Bash issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.