I3C support
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- c
- Domain
- embedded-iot
Research direction
The issue only asks whether I3C support is planned; it names no files, tests, or entry points. First determine the project's current hardware-interface structure and the intended scope of I3C support. Completion criteria are not specified in the issue.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Is there any planning for supporting I3C on Cerberus?
- Dominant language
- C
- Stars
- 68
- Forks
- 32
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from Azure/Project-Cerberus
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 15/100
Azure/Project-Cerberus#17 · 2 comments ·
All issues in Azure/Project-Cerberus
Similar issues
-
level/task module/gcp type/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 86/100
hapostgres/pg_auto_failover#1190 ·
-
docs
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
P3 sonic-vpp
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#29662 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 94/100
spack/spack-packages#6586 ·