Replace the driver install lock primitive: directory-rename cannot make claim-and-verify atomic, and the inode guard is not portable
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- tooling
Research direction
Start with withInstallLock, claimStaleLock, isStaleLock, releaseInstallLock, installLockPath, and heldLockPath in packages/drivers/src/resolve.ts, then read packages/drivers/test/install-lock.test.ts and the related #1201 behavior. Use the proposed O_EXCL sentinel direction and include a multi-process control. Done means the tests cover acquisition, stale claims, identity-safe release, and the identified contention gaps without relying on inode comparison.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Summary
The cross-process driver install lock added in #1201 uses a lock directory plus rename as its primitive, with an inode comparison covering one window the ownership token cannot. Three independent reviewers, across three review rounds, converged on the same structural conclusion: that primitive cannot make "confirm this is still the lock I judged stale" and "claim it" a single atomic step, and the inode fallback rests on a guarantee that is not portable.
This issue tracks replacing the primitive. It is deliberately not a bug report against #1201 — that PR is a large net improvement over main, where there is no cross-process lock at all — but it should not be mistaken for a proof of mutual exclusion, and the remaining gaps should not be patched further in place.
Why replace rather than repair
Three rounds of fixes on this protocol each closed real races and then exposed new ones in the compensating branches themselves:
- Round 1 added the lock. Review found stale cleanup could delete a peer's fresh lock.
- Round 2 made the claim a
rename(atomic, one winner) and added a pre-check plus a post-rename verify-and-restore. Review found the restore branch leaves the lock pathname free, so a third contender can take it, the restore fails, and the moved live lock is deleted — admitting two owners. - Round 2 also added an inode check for the
mkdir→owner.jsonwindow the token cannot cover. Review foundst_inois not a portable identity.
That pattern — each compensating branch generating the next finding — is the signature of a protocol being asked for a guarantee it cannot give, rather than of a fixable bug.
The specific gaps
1. Claim is not atomic with the staleness verdict. Nothing makes "read the owner record" and "rename the directory" one operation. The current code narrows the window from both sides (re-read before, verify what was actually moved after, restore on mismatch) but cannot close it.
2. The restore branch opens its own window. Between the mismatched rename and the restore, the lock pathname is unoccupied and a third process can create it. The restore then fails and the moved live lock is deleted.
3. Inode identity is not portable. fs.statSync(lockDir).ino is a per-filesystem identity. On Windows (untested on that PR), on overlay and network filesystems, and where a deleted directory's inode is promptly reused, the comparison can always-match (deleting a successor's live lock) or never-match (leaking our own). The failure is silent either way, and it degrades to exactly the pathname deletion it was added to prevent.
4. The lock wait outlasts only one peer. Each process counts its deadline from its own start, so with three or more simultaneous contenders the third's deadline can expire mid-install and it falls through to an unlocked performInstall over the same tree.
Proposed direction
An O_EXCL sentinel file whose content identifies the acquisition, replacing both the directory rename and the inode check:
open(path, "wx")is atomic and failsEEXISTwhen held — the same portable exclusion the lock directory gives — but the file has content, so the acquisition identity travels with the lock itself.- Claiming a stale lock becomes read-identity-then-conditionally-replace against a single object, rather than a verdict about one path followed by a rename of another.
- Release compares the identity in the file, so no inode comparison is needed and the
mkdir→owner.jsonwindow disappears: the identity is written by the same atomic operation that takes the lock.
Deriving the lock wait from the number of observed contenders, or re-checking readiness rather than falling through on timeout, should be considered alongside it (gap 4).
This wants its own PR, its own tests — including a multi-process control that demonstrates the assertion bites, as #1201's does — and its own review. It should not be appended to #1201.
Evidence
Six review threads on #1201, from three independent reviewers, all reaching this conclusion:
| Reviewer | Finding | Thread |
|---|---|---|
| codex | Block new acquisitions while restoring a stale-lock claim | https://github.com/AltimateAI/altimate-code/pull/1201#discussion_r3888887305 |
| kilo-code | releaseInstallLock's inode check relies on an unverified cross-platform guarantee |
https://github.com/AltimateAI/altimate-code/pull/1201#discussion_r3888899280 |
| cubic | Two acquisitions look identical when a stale lock has no readable owner.json |
https://github.com/AltimateAI/altimate-code/pull/1201#discussion_r3888905549 |
| cubic | Restoration rename can fail; the catch then deletes the moved live lock | https://github.com/AltimateAI/altimate-code/pull/1201#discussion_r3888905551 |
| cubic | Release safety depends on a platform-dependent, unverified inode premise | https://github.com/AltimateAI/altimate-code/pull/1201#discussion_r3888905561 |
| codex | Do not use reusable inodes as lock ownership | https://github.com/AltimateAI/altimate-code/pull/1201#discussion_r3888928250 |
Related but separate, also open on #1201 and not covered by this redesign:
- Lock wait outlasts only one peer (gap 4 above): https://github.com/AltimateAI/altimate-code/pull/1201#discussion_r3888905558
- A killed CLI leaves npm running in a detached process group, so pid-based staleness reclaims a lock whose work is still mutating the tree: https://github.com/AltimateAI/altimate-code/pull/1201#discussion_r3888887310
- Readiness is checked outside the cross-process lock, so a forced repair can race an observer: https://github.com/AltimateAI/altimate-code/pull/1201#discussion_r3888887308
Scope
withInstallLock,claimStaleLock,isStaleLock,releaseInstallLock,installLockPath/heldLockPathinpackages/drivers/src/resolve.tspackages/drivers/test/install-lock.test.ts- The
external_directorypermission patterns inpackages/opencode/src/altimate/tools/warehouse-install-driver.ts, if the sentinel changes what paths are written
Relates to #1202.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 813
- Forks
- 134
- Avg merge
- 2d 3h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 65
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from AltimateAI/altimate-code
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
AltimateAI/altimate-code#1359 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
AltimateAI/altimate-code#1323 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
AltimateAI/altimate-code#1288 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
AltimateAI/altimate-code#1285 ·
-
privacy: Altimate Base consent dialog no longer discloses persistent per-installation identifier Open
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
AltimateAI/altimate-code#1284 ·
All issues in AltimateAI/altimate-code
Similar issues
-
bug(cli): hapi doctor inline-media prints a fabricated B:\ helper-script path in packaged installs Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
Crush Open
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
catppuccin/catppuccin#3125 ·
-
Add a SECURITY.md Open
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
ElementsProject/cln-application#167 · 1 comment · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
Quantco/pnpm-licenses#17 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100