De-fork follow-up: census self-scan exclusion + wire ratchet CI step
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Tech stack
- github-actions, typescript
Research direction
Start with script/upstream/census.ts and the S1 PR (#1013) to understand the existing scan and baseline, then inspect .github/workflows/ci.yml for the deferred ratchet step. Run census.ts --check --ours HEAD, regenerate the 2026-07-18 baseline, and verify the committed HEAD passes with the CI ratchet wired and its ci.yml defork exemption.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Once script/upstream/ is committed (S1, PR #1013), `census.ts --check --ours HEAD` scans its OWN tooling files (analyze.ts, census.ts, bridge-merge.ts, audit-unwrapped.ts, README.md, unclosed-marker-allowlist.jsonc) which legitimately contain `altimate_change start` as code/data — the census parser then throws "unclosed marker" on those string literals.
Fix: census.ts should exclude its own tooling directory (script/upstream/) from the marker scan — scanning the marker-checking tooling for markers is a category error, and those files contain zero real altimate_change blocks (only string-literal false-positives), so excluding them keeps the fork_owned count consistent with the current baseline.
Then: regenerate the 2026-07-18 baseline (should be identical block counts), add the deferred census-ratchet CI step back to .github/workflows/ci.yml (with a defork-exemption for the ci.yml ratchet-step marker), and verify `census.ts --check` passes at the committed HEAD.
Deferred from the S1 PR (#1013) to keep its CI green. The tooling + baselines are correct; only the CI ratchet guardrail wiring waits on this.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 813
- Forks
- 134
- Avg merge
- 2d 5h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 62
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from AltimateAI/altimate-code
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
AltimateAI/altimate-code#1323 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
AltimateAI/altimate-code#1288 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
AltimateAI/altimate-code#1285 ·
-
privacy: Altimate Base consent dialog no longer discloses persistent per-installation identifier Open
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
AltimateAI/altimate-code#1284 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 72/100
AltimateAI/altimate-code#1283 ·
All issues in AltimateAI/altimate-code
Similar issues
-
Browser Waiting for: Product Owner
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
getsentry/sentry-javascript#24577 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
agilepathway/label-checker#640 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
copse-dev/agent-pane#2953 ·
-
agentic-workflows
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
githubnext/rig#534 ·
-
automation missing-model model-sync provider:pioneer
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
anomalyco/models.dev#7701 ·